Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Having sex with someone twice your age (or just much older than you)

Anonymous A started this discussion 6.2 years ago #8,633

What do you guys think about having sex with someone much older than yourself? I had quite a lot of (gay) sex with someone twice my age and it kinda feels like I sucked off my dad. I dunno. What do you guys think about this?

Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #151,533

If you wanna suck off your dad's classmates, go for it. Not like you're hurting anything.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,534

What about someone half your age?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,535

I was going to sup To4str, but I'm not feeling it.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,540

36? Could be alright, given their faces aren't already creased up like an origami crane.

(Edited 5 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,542

@151,534 (C)

I don't think anyone here would turn down someone half their age and the desired gender.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 12 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,543

@OP

You're really gross.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 52 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,545

@151,542 (A)

WHAT??

I AM 20 YEARS OLD YOU SICK FUCK!!

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,550

@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
nvm cited post was edited

(Edited 45 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,555

@151,540 (E)

32? I'm almost 20...

@151,545 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)

You can't sincerely tell me that you would say "no".

Anonymous E replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,557

@previous (A)
Math failure, brain went full retard. It happens to me a lot in humid rooms.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,559

@151,555 (A)

> You can't sincerely tell me that you would say "no".

Yes I would. I would say "No". I am sincerely telling you that I would say "No."


here I go, getting trolled in a to4str thread. This is a brand new low for me.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,562

@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
What if she's hot, and you're in a country where it's legal?

Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 6.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,563

@previous (C)
> implying little girls can be hot

HAHA OH WOW

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,567

I might :') have engaged in some kind of sexual activity with a person greater than double my age, and let's just say I won't be doing it again anytime soon.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 25 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,568

@151,563 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
Cute*

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,570

@151,567 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
another way to look at this, is they engaged in sexual activity with someone half their age.

Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6 replied with this 6.2 years ago, 12 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,571

@151,563 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
You sure are getting awfully defensive, Falco.

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 6.2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,572

@151,570 (C)
Sounds slightly paedoish tbh

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,575

@151,563 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)

It's all subjective. One cannot deny the innocence and beauty of children. I see the face of God in every child.

@151,567 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)

But they're much more experienced.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,577

Image went missingpic related its to4str's gloryhole experience.

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 6.2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,578

@151,575 (A)
> But they're much more experienced.

Not always, to4str.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,579

@151,571 (Dodongo !ZQvsveEcD6)
This.

Falco "doth protests too much"

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,580

Hmmm. I'm a woman but would only or rather prefer to date men a bit older than I am. I think this preference will work out better as I get older.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,581

@151,570 (C)

Hell, I would half sex with someone a third of my own age if it was consensual. That is another topic completely. Can we stay on topic please?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 42 seconds later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,582

Externally hosted image

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,583

@151,581 (A)
we all know you would have sex with a 7 year old you fucking disgusting pedophile.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,585

@previous (H)

After having sex with a man when I was that age, I can't see a problem with it. As long as it's consensual.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 0 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,586

@151,583 (H)
I'd drop a zygote down my urethra.

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 6.2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,587

@151,581 (A)
> sex with 7-year-old
> consensual

swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,588

@151,585 (A)
Can babies consent?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,590

@151,587 (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,591

@previous (C)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,594

@previous (SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN.)
That concerns when the government recognizes consent.

A child can consent, but the government will disregard it.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 5 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,595

@151,588 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Obviously one must be able to verbalize in order to consent. There must also be no coercion or bribery.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,596

@151,590 (C)
Children cannot consent because they don't understand what they are agreeing to. That's also why they can't sign contracts, drink, drive, or join the army.

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 6.2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,597

@151,594 (C)
@151,595 (A)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,598

@151,595 (A)
So what, like two is an okay age?

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 31 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,599

@151,596 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
dont argue with to4str's shit troll logic, toto.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,605

@151,596 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Bullshit. Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man). How do the children "not understand" the logistics of sex? Lets face it, it isn't very fucking elaborate.

@151,598 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Depends on a number of factors. It shouldn't cause any physical harm either.

Anonymous D replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,609

@previous (A)
I hope when you die they never recover a body.

(Edited 44 seconds later.)

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 17 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,610

@151,605 (A)
> Bullshit. Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man).
yeah in your fucked up fantasies maybe. fuck off, idiot.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,615

@previous (H)

I have spoken to many who have wanted me to drive out to them.

Picture related, he's 14.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,616

@previous (A)

> Picture related, he's 14.

Why the fuck was my picture deleted?

(Edited 6 minutes later.)

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,619

Image went missing

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #151,620

@151,616 (A)
It's called pedobashing. Some day the world will look back in disgust at the intolerance of the age.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,622

@previous (C)

Gay sex was illegal in the UK until 1967. It would not surprise me if people gradually realized that not all pedophiles are rapists/evil and the laws are changed accordingly.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,625

@previous (A)
You still have yet to resolve the physics issues inherent in babyfucking, sir.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,627

Externally hosted image@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)

> You still have yet to resolve the physics issues inherent in babyfucking, sir.

> physics issues

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,630

@151,605 (A)
So you think that a two year old or any child for that matter is mature enough to understand the risks of sexual activity?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,631

@151,605 (A)
Also, why can't children vote, drink, drive or sign a contract?

Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,632

@151,625 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> physics issues inherent in babyfucking
Hmmmm...
> fuck baby
> create a rip in the time-space continuum

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 58 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,633

@151,627 (C)
We need an international commission to develop a licensure procedure so men with micropenii can be granted the freedoms of babyfucking that are so desperately needed in this bold, new post-pederast world.

Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,634

14+ should be the minimum AoC.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,635

@151,630 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

You keep mentioning two-year-olds because it's much more controversial. I do not condone sex with babies but acknowledge that some children are mature enough to understand and consent to sex.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,637

> spending more time on the internet whining about sexual issues than actually getting laid

Sure is average intelligence middle class white suburban male, in hurr.

(Edited 46 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,638

@151,635 (A)
No, I mentioned it to understand where you draw the line. Would some two year old's be mature enough to have sex? Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,639

@151,631 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

> Also, why can't children vote
Because children do not read the news, pay attention to politics, etc. They would vote in Hannah Montana, and Justin Beiber.
> drink
The brain is developing throughout childhood, and really stops physical development around 21, so drinking during this time increases the chance of alcoholism. If everyone waited until they were 21 to drink, alcoholism would be very rare. The damage that is done before 21 is much more than damage done after the age.
> drive
Because they can't reach the pedal? The aren't as coordinated as an adult, and would have trouble following the rules, and would have less impulse control (racing).
> or sign a contract?
They can sign a contract, but it's considered void. For good reason too, letting someone get themselves into debt, as well as other obligations is hard to get out of. With sex, you can say stop at any time.

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,640

@151,638 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

> Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?
The child.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,641

@previous (C)
The child? So if a four year old were to ask for sex, it should be obliged?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,642

@151,639 (C)
They cannot say stop at any time. Children are under the power of the adults around them. Do you really think that they would get a fair say in regards to their sexual treatment?

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,643

@151,639 (C)
> With sex, you can say stop at any time.
trololololololo

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,644

@151,638 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

> No, I mentioned it to understand where you draw the line.

I don't want to say that sex with a child of that age should be outlawed because there are probably some walking, talking two-year-olds fully capable of their own conscious decisions. As long is there is consent, there is no coercion, blackmail etc... That's the software part, the hardware must be compatible too.

> Who gets to decide if a child is mature enough for sexual activity?

The child. I would much rather see a system where people are able to make their own decisions than one which takes a general rule of thumb (AoC) and apply it to everyone.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,645

@previous (A)
> there are probably some walking, talking two-year-olds fully capable of their own conscious decisions
Ohhh sweet, sweet delusion.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,646

@151,644 (A)
@151,641 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,648

@151,644 (A)
How do you feel about incest?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B triple-posted this 6.2 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,649

@151,639 (C)
What about the risks of sex? Are they less dangerous than alcohol?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,651

I, for one, believe that babyfucking can get this economy back on track.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,652

@151,648 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Opposite sex incest should be illegal because it creates mutilated, deformed babies. Same sex incest is another matter.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,654

@previous (A)
What about underage incest where no one can get pregnant?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,661

@151,641 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Obliged? No.

Allowed? Yes.

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,667

@151,642 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
If a party involved in sexual intercourse says "stop" and the partner refuses, it is rape, I never said it wouldn't be for anything else.

You could argue that a poor person is under the influence of the person they depend on for housing, or that a shy person it under the influence of the people pressuring them into sex as well.

Anonymous C triple-posted this 6.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,668

@151,648 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
There is no reason it should be illegal.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,673

@151,667 (C)
It's not the same, because children have no independence. Do you think a little boy could or would freely tell his father to stop molesting him?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,675

@151,649 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The risks of sex are easily mitigated with condoms.

Just as some would say Marihuana shouldn't be illegal because smoke does damage to the lungs because there are other ways of taking the drug, so this argument could be applied to this scenario:

Helping someone masturbate.
Oral sex.

Etc. that do not have the risks of typical sex.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,676

@151,673 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Again, you're bringing rape into the equation here. We already established it needs to be consensual.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,677

@151,675 (C)
Should children be allowed to smoke? Also, that means that certain sex acts with children would be illegal, correct?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,678

@151,673 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
He could avoid consenting in the first place, and if he did consent and changed his mind, yes, he could say "stop".

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,679

@151,677 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

> Should children be allowed to smoke?
Children are more susceptible to addiction.

> Also, that means that certain sex acts with children would be illegal, correct?
Those that cause physical damage, yes.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,680

@151,676 (A)
How could it ever be consensual? Who would a child ever have sex with that didn't have complete power over the child? You would have to exclude family, babysitters, teachers, coaches, and clergymen.

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,681

@151,678 (C)
Then he would have to live with the person that he angered by turning down sex. None of this makes sense to you?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,682

@151,680 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

God, you're such an idiot. Not everyone that has sex with children wants to have "complete power over them".

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,683

@151,681 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Where did you get the idea that only children can be under this dependence?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,685

@151,682 (A)
You didn't answer me at all.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,686

@151,682 (A)
They just want to unleash the love those children so desperately need, huh? You pædos are so selfless. If only the normals were looking out for the kids’ needs.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,688

@151,683 (C)
Children don't have other options like adults do.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,689

@151,685 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Your questions rely on the assumption that everyone who wants sex with a child wants to use them for their own pleasure and dominate them physically.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,691

@previous (A)
Should parents be allowed to have sex with their children? Teachers? Coaches? Religious figures?

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,692

@151,689 (A)
fuck off, troll

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,693

Have we resolved which positions are most gratifying? I’m talking about the slides, swings, and mary-go-rounds. Do we need to add bedrooms to the house play structures?

Which time of day is better for babyfucking? The morning nap, afternoon snacktime, or afternoon nap?

(Edited 41 seconds later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,694

@151,688 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
There are many women dependent on their husbands to stay off the streets, and cannot scrape together enough to live without them, and have little work history.

Is the husband committing rape?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,696

@previous (C)
Property can’t be raped, you troll.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 11 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,697

@151,691 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Yes. If they both want to have sex.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,698

@151,694 (C)
Women have the choice of borrowing money, living with family, or just not fucking their husbands. What choices do children have?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,700

@151,697 (A)
Has anybody written a nursery rhyme for this, yet?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,701

@151,697 (A)
How would you stop people from constantly coercing children?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,702

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Kids can just say no, you scum.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,703

@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
I don't see how this seems strange to anyone.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,704

@151,696 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
This @151,698 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

> Women have the choice of borrowing money, living with family,
Not necessarily.
> just not fucking their husbands.
To quote you: "Then [s]he would have to live with the person that [s]he angered by turning down sex"

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,706

@151,701 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Children would have to be educated about sex early on. They would have to learn that having sex with someone is their decision to make, if someone makes the decision for them then they should report the crime and it would be dealt with as rape.

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,707

ITT: fucktarded trolling to the nth degree

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,708

@151,704 (C)
Adults always have options. What could the child do? If they turn in daddy, they break up their family.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,709

@151,702 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)

> Kids can just say no

Yes, they can. If someone ignores a child when they say "no", then that individual needs to be locked up.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,710

@151,706 (A)
People coerce children even now and they are taught to report rape from a young age.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,711

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

It won't be adequate when age of consent laws are abolished.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,712

@151,709 (A)
Exactly. Sex and daily vegetable servings are the decisions that are holding our children back from true freedom.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,715

@151,711 (A)
That's not the point. I said that children are frequently coerced into sex even now while its illegal. Why do you think that will change if it's legalized?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 37 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,717

@151,708 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Adults do not always have options, and this should be obvious from the repeat domestic abuse cases.

> If they turn in daddy, they break up their family.
No different than the way it is now.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,718

@151,706 (A)
The CPSC desperately needs to update their toy regulations to consider the implications of anal insertion hazards.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,719

@151,712 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)

The real victims in all of this are the sexually repressed, intelligent, conscious thinking children that take the decision to have sex, and their partners.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,721

@151,715 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
If it's the same, then it doesn't matter either way.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,723

@151,717 (C)

Of course! Getting rid of age of consent laws will make kit easier to victimize children. Now, CPS steps in when sexual activity with children is suspected, if the laws were changed, they would have to look for lack of consent. How in the hell would you get reliable testimony from a toddler?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #151,724

@151,719 (A)
Absolutely. What life do you lead if naptime, tickle fights, and playground balls are your only outlets for your inner slut?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,725

@151,721 (C)
I didn't say it was the same. How would this law help children?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 59 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,727

@151,723 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The 1974 CPS publication “Babyfucking and You” addresses the concerns of reliable testimony and found that sippie cups with apple juice were 9 percent more effective than time outs.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,728

Well how about we make it legal for children to have sex with someone in their own age group. Would that satisfy you?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,729

@151,724 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)

> What life do you lead if naptime, tickle fights, and playground balls are your only outlets for your inner slut?

Not a very pleasant one.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 5 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,730

@151,727 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
lololol

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 35 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,732

@151,725 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Someone can be angry about being turned down for sex no matter the law.

Ending the AoC would mean less persecution for pedos, and not harm children who can still say no.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,734

@151,728 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Protip: it is.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,735

@151,728 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
A start, but kids aren't prosecuted for that anyway.

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,736

inb4 a whole new use for the diaper changing stations in public restrooms

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,737

@151,728 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

You just don't get it. If the child wants to only have sex with other children, that's fine. If the child doesn't want to have sex at all, that's also fine. I think these things should be the decision of the child and not the government.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,739

@151,732 (C)
So, this law would not be beneficial for children at all? Just for the pedophiles? Gotcha.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,740

@151,737 (A)
Then adults should not be involved at all.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,741

@151,732 (C)
If your eight year old partner threw a tantrum because you weren’t in the mood to push her shit in, which one of you would sleep on the couch that night?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,742

@151,736 (H)
Wait… what?! I just assumed those were some fancy sort of gloryhole setup.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,743

@151,739 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
It would not harm children, and it would give them more of a choice.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,744

@151,739 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

No age of consent laws would give children much more power and benefit them most.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 56 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,746

@151,740 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

(Unless the child wants to have sex with an adult.)

Anonymous D replied with this 6.2 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,747

Sup To4str

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,748

@151,741 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
The child No means no, and the pedo should not be punished for wanting to stay abstinent for the night.

Anonymous D replied with this 6.2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,749

@151,743 (C)
Sup mountainman.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,750

@151,744 (A)
Explain to me what ways this would benefit children. I want to hear the pros and the cons from you.

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,751

this thread is why america should elect ron paul.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,752

@151,746 (A)
What if a child starting crying hysterically during sex but did not say no. What that have been rape?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,753

Image went missing

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 29 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,754

@151,750 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Quite simply it would give them the right to make decisions for themselves instead of having government do it for them.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,755

@151,748 (C)
Yeah, but, she started it.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,756

I want to hear the pros and cons of removing AOC laws.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,757

@151,752 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

What if an adult starting crying hysterically during sex but did not say no. What that have been rape?

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,758

@151,753 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> riverside rapist church

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,760

@151,754 (A)
More freedom? Okay, in what ways would it hurt them?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,761

@151,755 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
which is why she would be on the couch.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 28 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,762

@151,757 (C)
So a child is considered to be as able minded and coherent as adults?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,763

@151,756 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Pro: stops persecuting consensual relationships
con: none, people can still say no

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,764

@151,756 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Pros:
- It would give children the freedom to have sex when they think it's appropriate

Cons:
- None.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,765

This really sounds like it more for the adults benefit than anything else.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,766

@151,756 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Pros: freedom
Cons: diaper manufacturers scramble to engineer the optimal semen absorption materials, creating the great depression of 2020 due to inflation

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 9 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,767

@151,762 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
It's not up to me or the government to determine who can make good choices.

There are some adults who have sex, get STDs, pregnant, all to someone they do not love. Should that be illegal?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,768

@151,764 (A)
Everything has some negative aspect! Be honest.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,769

@151,767 (C)
Adults can consent.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,771

@151,765 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
What's wrong with that? Helping people isn't bad, hurting people is bad.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,772

@151,765 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Come on. Get serious, now. Little girls tell me every day that a well-bruised cervix and some light hair pulling are just the things they need to make it through a hard week at school.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,773

@151,769 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

What about a 20-year-old with the mental age of 8?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,774

@151,771 (C)
It's bad if helping adults would hurt children.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 0 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,775

@151,769 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
So can children.

con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun: Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb: Give permission for something to happen: "he consented to a search by a detective".

Anonymous H replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 second later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,776

pros: durex and trojan come out with a new line 'ribbed for his/her teething pleasure'
cons: to4str quits posting on this board from all of the sweet infant ass he's getting

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,777

@151,774 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

It doesn't harm children, children can refuse to consent.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,778

@151,775 (C)
But a child couldn't consent to a search by a detective or make their own medical decisions.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,779

@151,777 (C)
Tell me. What do you think would happen if a child refused their father sex?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,781

@151,778 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
You really need to understand the difference between consent, and legal recognition of that consent.

(Edited 18 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,782

@previous (C)
What if a child asked to be punched in the face? Would the person who hit him be punished?

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 7 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,783

Image went missingf—u—c—k   m—e   l—i—k—e   t—h—e   w—h—o—r—e   y—o—u   w—a—n—t   m—e   t—o   b—e

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,784

Image went missing@151,781 (C)

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,786

@151,779 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The same thing no matter the law being discussed.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,787

@previous (C)
How do you think the father would react? Answer honestly.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,789

Externally hosted image@151,784 (A)

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,790

@151,787 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
He’d understand, gently put the child down for a nap, and then go plow that 7-year-old whom is always giving him the sexy eyes when he’s mowing the lawn.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 26 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,791

@151,787 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
The father could react a number of ways, but the law that is being discussed will not affect it, so it's irrelevant.

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,792

@151,790 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Well said! There are many fish in the sea.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 22 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,793

@151,791 (C)
It is not irrelevant. It's very telling that you refuse to answer this question.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,794

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
No two fathers are the same.

He could react calmly, or angrily. Either could happen if there was or wasn't an AoC, and they could also happen to his wife.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,795

@previous (C)
Adult humans have more options for leaving a bad situation.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,797

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Perhaps usually, but not always.

Anyway what is your point? What does this have to do with the topic at hand.

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,798

I'm 25 and almost had sex with a 40-year-old. We were both pretty drunk at the time and I'm glad we didn't do it. It would have been really awkward. She is pretty hot though. You wouldn't think she was a day over 32.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,799

@151,797 (C)
Because age of consent laws were created to stop the widespread victimization of children that is caused by their lack of power and options to leave dangerous situations. The Child labor laws were created for the same reasons.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,801

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
But child labor laws are about economic oppression of vulnerable persons. This is about the sweet, sweet freedom of loli ass.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,802

@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
I love you.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 17 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,803

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Too old.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,804

@previous (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Too ballsweat.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 41 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,856

To4str you still look just as fat as you used to, is that why you prey on children? Cos girls your age laugh at your titties!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 40 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,916

@previous (N)

I lost 130 pounds bud. Girls are for fags.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,922

Hey toast, why do child labor laws exist? Can't they consent to working long hours?

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,928

@151,741 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)

> If your eight year old partner threw a tantrum because you weren’t in the mood to push her shit in, which one of you would sleep on the couch that night?

I think this was the best post ITT for the whole world system it implies. Pedos married to 8 yo's having normal marital difficulties like a sitcom. lol 10/10 also the disgusting graphicness

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 5 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,929

@151,922 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Radical statist interventionalists have foisted their flawed policies onto an unwilling populace. It is no accident that the 20th century saw a great decline in personal liberty and economic freedom when these leftists declared children could no longer seek economic gratification with adults.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,930

@151,928 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
I’m flattered that you of all people would recognize my finest writings to date.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,931

@151,929 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
lololol

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,949

@151,930 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Others would not have been able to paint such a picture.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 41 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,981

How do you feel about child labor laws?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,992

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
That's a broad question.

What would you like to know?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #151,995

@previous (C)
Should they be repealed? Are they necessary? Why were they created? Do they hurt or help children?

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 41 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,012

Only mc could turn a thread about sex with old people into a thread about sex with young people

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 6.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,020

@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Two sides of the same coin.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,024

@152,012 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Do you agree with age of consent laws?

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,028

Externally hosted imagepic related

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 25 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,029

Externally hosted image@previous (C)
Whoops wrong pic

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,057

@152,020 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Your true feelings are revealed.

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 46 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,060

@152,024 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I agree that contracts made by minors should be considered binding.

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,063

@152,057 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
What "feelings"? If the topic is about having sex with people much older than you, then you must be much younger than them, hence it's "two sides of the same coin."

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,070

@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
You see no difference in having sex with a 40yo and a 10yo. Kill yourself pedo

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,082

@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
That's not what I said, dipshit. All I said was that it's two sides to the same coin because if I'm 25 and the woman I'm fucking is 40 then to me it's sex with an older woman but for her it's sex with a younger man. Talking about having sex with someone twice your age means that the other person in the equation is having sex with someone half their age. That doesn't automatically mean we're talking about pedophilia.

Anonymous C replied with this 6.2 years ago, 40 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,085

@152,063 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
mfw when Broseph is a pedo

Unexpected. You hide it well.

Anonymous C double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,087

@152,082 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Yea, that is exactly what a pedo would say.

Syntax joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,088

Ron Paul is older then Thee & eye am older then God herself.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,090

@previous (Syntax)
Does it make you feel weird that you're at the very least 40 years older than anyone else on this forum?

Anonymous P replied with this 6.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,107

Yikes how did eye get 2b nonnymouse?

Syntax here!!


@previous (Q)
Of course not. However a recent poll on ages has you off base re "anyone else" Yes many are preteens still living in mommies basement. Then again you and eye know someone who runs a forum (no need to give him publicity) and he is at deaths door at just about 40.

And consider a fact no one here can deny. Itamake who is a mere 20 recently had a heart attack!!!

My innards r in much better shape then most preteens here, however no doubt my face is melting off re amount of sun exposure.

Also and this is the best part - I do not have to rely on lefty or righty for you know what lolol

(Edited 40 seconds later.)

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,110

@152,060 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Even with very small children?

Syntax replied with this 6.2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,111

@152,107 (P)
To verify reply just made

how how did eye get cookies mixed up

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 54 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,115

@152,060 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Do you agree with age of consent laws?

ltamake !3vZ7A06glM joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,149

sup to4str

protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,160

@152,107 (P)
Obvious Markov Chain is obvious.

!JuMPb0dbaE joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,162

Too old.

Oops, I originally read that as half your age. I guess what I says still applies though.

(Edited 30 seconds later.)

Syntax replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,163

@152,160 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Yaza

The board game Monopoly works more better if one uses Monto Carlo with Markov. Now if if you take ones initial Beliefs + Recent Objective Data = A New and Improved Belief one wins everytyme unless your opponent is running the same theorem.

Eye recently found that in the real world of real monopoly this scheme has holes.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,168

@previous (Syntax)
Stop playing games you language-simulating algorithm. You can't even roll dice.

hamfist !!mtq555+/1 joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,180

I'll probably end up fucking cougars at a bar like a pathetic fuck when I grow up

!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 6.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,190

@previous (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)
That isn't pathetic. That's fucking awesome.

hamfist !!mtq555+/1 replied with this 6.2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,207

@previous (!JuMPb0dbaE)
Are we still talking "40-something unmarried woman" cougars?

Anonymous Q replied with this 6.2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,209

@152,180 (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)

> I'll probably end up fucking noone 4ever.

ftfy

!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,210

@152,207 (hamfist !!mtq555+/1)
Yes. Women who take care of themselves can be banging in their 40s.

hamfist !!mtq555+/1 replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,212

@152,209 (Q)
> noone

Syntax replied with this 6.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,220

Back when I was about 18 and dating one very sweet blonde her mom came on to me. MoM was even more lovely then daughter. I regret not taking her up on offer.

Now not one chance in HELL eye wood think of getting nakkid with some gal older then Me lol

I did hang/date/make/love with a woman older then me by maybe one decade. She hid her age from me so I will never know.

Way she worked out daily kept her body is fyne fyne shape!!

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,276

@152,082 (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4)
Lol did you read this topic before you said that?

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,279

@152,110 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Sorry I meant should not.

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos triple-posted this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,280

@152,115 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)

Not really.

Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 4 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,365

@152,070 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
@152,070 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)

> You see no difference in having sex with a 40yo and a 10yo. Kill yourself pedo


This coming from the man who is "in love" with a 14 year old girl?

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,366

@previous (V)
Love does not hurt people.

Anonymous V replied with this 6.2 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,367

@151,575 (A)
> I see the face of God in every child.

Are you fucking stupid? Don't you know that there's no such thing as God?

Anonymous V double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,368

@151,605 (A)
> Children can consent. I've spoken to so many kids (11, 13, 14, 15) that have desperately wanted to have sex with me (an older man)


Maybe In your fantasies.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,369

@previous (V)

In real life.

Anonymous V replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,374

People here (including OP)believe in the concept of "Childhood innocence."

The problem with "childhood innocence".


The principal defect of this concept is that it implies that sexuality is a "sin", and that children are "innocent" because they have not as yet indulged in this "sin". The singularly Christian notion of "childhood innocence" is a vestige of our anti-sexual heritage which reached a high point, in many aspects, in the Victorian era. Its origin can be traced to the 1700s. It is a highly irrational notion, and I need not attempt to refute it. For the burden of proof is not on the Author, that sexuality is a sin. I have yet to see an argument that sexuality is a sin, and hence have nothing to refute. I have only come across dogmatic assertions, mainly in the form of religion, of the sinfulness of sexuality and "childhood innocence" (which is implicit in the notion of the sinfulness of sexuality).

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,380

@previous (V)
This.

!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 6.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,397

@152,365 (V)
How dare you.

No one has control of his or her heart.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

Anonymous V replied with this 6.2 years ago, 37 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,399

@152,369 (A)

I seriously doubt an 11 year old would want to have sex with a man who is almost 20 years old.

Why would a 5th-6th grader want to have sex with a man almost 20 years old.?

!JuMPb0dbaE replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,406

@previous (V)
I wanted to fuck many many women much older when I was younger.

You need to think back to when you were a kid. Kids aren't any less capable of understanding things than adults. It is the lack of experiences they have to compare to know the most correct course of action.

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #152,412

@previous (!JuMPb0dbaE)
This. I distinctly remember fantasizing about having sex with ~30s woman when I was in grade 11 or 12. I just didn't interact with many lol

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,795

@152,280 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
Do you agree with child labor laws?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B double-posted this 6.2 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #152,797

@152,406 (!JuMPb0dbaE)
I believe that they are less able to understand the consequences of their actions.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B triple-posted this 6.2 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,020

MM? Child labor laws?

Fats Ferguson !BBbudGf3kM joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,029

Last night, my father had a nightmare. Honestly, it was more of a night-terror. His doctor had warned us this may happen from time to time. The accident was pretty severe, and he came out of it a bit less than okay. It was the first time I had cried in a long time. To see him like this hurt me. It hurt my heart. I knew my father well. I knew how bull-headed and pushy he seemed at times to the untrained eye. But when you got to know him, when he really trusted you, you saw that side of him. The side that just wanted to be a strong-willed man. I have often times wondered if he decided to only leave the drinking problem to me and held out on that quality. I don't think my father saw a lot of himself in me. I really didn't see a lot of myself in him. Still, I think we made our peace that night. I knew he didn't want to leave this world in that state; thrashing and flailing in a cold panic. My father passed peacefully, and with dignity last night. I smothered him in his sleep with a five pound marshmallow.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,030

@previous (Fats Ferguson !BBbudGf3kM)
Fuck off you troll.

Fats Ferguson !BBbudGf3kM replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,034

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
He tried to relate to me. A little. Honestly, it was the most I ever saw him commit to something I knew he didn't like or understand. Perhaps I didn't devote enough time to what HE wanted. I suppose I'll ask myself this question for the rest of my life. This is my burden now. I'll find a way to deal with it. Perhaps one day I'll have a son of my own and we'll click. Perhaps not. I hope so because this pain is more than I think I can deal with.

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,040

@152,795 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
I don't really know enough about child labor laws to comment on them.

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,045

@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
But you know enough about age of consent laws?

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,065

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Well there's not as much to them.

protip !!pMmAiEwOm replied with this 6.2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,088

@153,029 (Fats Ferguson !BBbudGf3kM)
D:

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,091

@153,065 (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
How do you know if you haven't done any research?

RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,092

@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Where did I say that I haven't done any research?

swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 6.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #153,096

@previous (RonPaul2012 !4EB6xd.Oos)
You said that you know nothing about AoC laws so how can you know that they is less to them?

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #155,346

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
:
[upload]

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting, also keep in mind you can minify URLs using MiniURL and generate image macros using MiniMacro.