Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Tranny sues women only waxing service because Muslim worker wouldn't wax balls.

Anonymous A started this discussion 1 week ago #75,459

Great story this one. Who's side to take? The Muslim women or the transgendered women.

https://windsor.ctvnews.ca/mobile/human-rights-application-launched-against-windsor-body-waxing-business-by-transgender-woman-1.3925911

The complainant indicates in the application that she contacted Mad Wax in Windsor in March to inquire about getting her legs waxed. She says she also asked whether Transgender women were welcome for waxing services... When the manager, Jason Carruthers returned her call, the complainant alleges he advised that Mad Wax does not provide waxing services to men and that his ‘waxer’ is a Muslim woman who is not comfortable waxing male parts. Carruthers also indicated no other staff were available to perform the request.

The complainant claims to have offered to educate the manager on his duty to accommodate, then sought waxing services elsewhere

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #889,773

She asked for her legs to be waxed and got a call back saying "sorry we don't wax balls!". That's pretty transphobic.

Meta joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 11 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,778

Isn't intersectionality supposed to prevent this?

YeastPaste™ !iAYoMftFR2 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 23 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,779

@previous (Meta)
*intersexuality

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 6 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,782

@889,778 (Meta)
I still can't find an easy explanation on the meaning of intersectionality

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,786

@previous (A)
Me either, but from 30 seconds on Google, I think it's like, when you are a black muslim woman; You experience the intersection of racism, islamophobia and sexism.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,788

@previous (B)
Yeah I got that but it also seems to excuse minorities of discrimination but I don't get the reason behind it.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 4 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,792

@previous (A)
I was just looking for a definition of the word, not a 500 page feminist manifesto.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 19 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,794

Solution is simple. Salon can hire a tranny as a temp. Then invite that dude for a free waxing. Tranny employee can apply boiling hot wax to the dudes package.

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,795

@previous (E)
She just wanted her legs waxed, the manager was the one to bring up ball waxing.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,798

nobody's appreciating that this place is called Mad Wax
it's funny

Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 4 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,802

@889,795 (B)
Ah I did not read the article.
> She says she also asked whether Transgender women were welcome for waxing services.

This must be one ugly as all fuck Tranny. Why ask that question... If the he really could pass as a she?

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,803

@previous (E)

> Ah I did not read the article.
> >She says she also asked whether Transgender women were welcome for waxing services.
>
> This must be one ugly as all fuck Tranny. Why ask that question... If the he really could pass as a she?

i found her picture

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 7 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,804

@889,802 (E)
You didn't even read the OP...

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 44 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,805

@889,803 (F)
Please stop posting his photo I have to delete it and it's annoying.

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 10 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,806

@OP

> Great story this one. Who's side to take? The Muslim women or the transgendered women.
>
> https://windsor.ctvnews.ca/mobile/human-rights-application-launched-against-windsor-body-waxing-business-by-transgender-woman-1.3925911
>
> The complainant indicates in the application that she contacted Mad Wax in Windsor in March to inquire about getting her legs waxed. She says she also asked whether Transgender women were welcome for waxing services... When the manager, Jason Carruthers returned her call, the complainant alleges he advised that Mad Wax does not provide waxing services to men and that his ‘waxer’ is a Muslim woman who is not comfortable waxing male parts. Carruthers also indicated no other staff were available to perform the request.
>
> The complainant claims to have offered to educate the manager on his duty to accommodate, then sought waxing services elsewhere

that pic is captioned oddly politically -- it appears that someone has taken a news pic and added their own political commentary like an asshole

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,808

Externally hosted image@889,805 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

> Please stop posting his photo I have to delete it and it's annoying.

yeah yeah yeah fine I know it's annoying

Meta replied with this 1 week ago, 42 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,809

@889,786 (B)
I thought it was where oppressed groups band together. Like, for example, white feminists supporting BLM, and BLM supports DACA, and DREAMers are against Islamaphobia, the Muslims are against homo/transphobia, etc.

The intersection of oppressed groups.

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #889,811

instead of studying these bullshit academic/activist terms, lets just ignore them altogether, or grossly misuse them in protest:

intersectionality is the property that non-parallel geometric objects have

Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,819

@889,804 (B)
Indeed I did. OP was being funny with the wax ball in headlines which on chans is par for the course
I after my first reply read the article

"I am a Transgender woman, and their disclosing my name, gender identity and personal information to various media outlets has left me feeling threatened, exposed, with my rights violated in terms of seeking services as a woman in the Windsor-Essex community.”

This reminds me of departed Nexus. If you cannot stand the heat then get out of the kitchen.

How the fuck does this dude expect to stay out of media and file a law suite? I figure he is in it for the money and based on Canuck laws he will end up with enough cash to have his package chopped off and dick turned in2 a fake Vagina.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,822

@previous (E)

> Indeed I did. OP was being funny with the wax ball in headlines which on chans is par for the course
> I after my first reply read the article
>
> "I am a Transgender woman, and their disclosing my name, gender identity and personal information to various media outlets has left me feeling threatened, exposed, with my rights violated in terms of seeking services as a woman in the Windsor-Essex community.”
>
> This reminds me of departed Nexus. If you cannot stand the heat then get out of the kitchen.
>
> How the fuck does this dude expect to stay out of media and file a law suite? I figure he is in it for the money and based on Canuck laws he will end up with enough cash to have his package chopped off and dick turned in2 a fake Vagina.

ugh

Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,824

@previous (F)
That two bit for shit tranny will end up with more money than you dude.
Oh and good to c you have not tried suicide again.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,827

@previous (E)

> Oh and good to c you have not tried suicide again.

who

Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,828

@previous (F)
You

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,831

@previous (E)
Hey listen buddy the day I "attempt" suicide is the day I've got a sword in my gut. im not messin that one up

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,833

@previous (F)

Maybe he thinks you're me

Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,839

@previous (I)
Right now I wish I were not Thee. Messed up one line in a new contract proposal and the company signed it and insists on keeping me to the messed up terms.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,840

@889,833 (I)
well probably. how was suicide

Anonymous I replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,841

@previous (F)

Distressing and humiliating.

@889,839 (E)

Sorry to hear that. Maybe you can kill everyone who knows about it.

Meta replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,842

Anonymous E replied with this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,846

@889,841 (I)
Reminds me of the fate of autphag-Sophie attempts at suicide. The 2nd one where he stripped naked and ran around the woods until he was stopped by law and tossed in loony bin.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 30 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #889,855

I just can't see what all the fuss is about

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 44 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,862

@889,805 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Why do you have to delete it?

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,863

@previous (A)
mods are scared that syntax will do a DMCA or something, even though he doesn't hold the copyright on the photos, had no expectation of privacy while in public and technically isn't being defamed by a silly photoshop.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 40 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,881

@889,862 (A)
@previous (B)
http://minichan.org/rules

!!Czx/4sT8c joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 52 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,886

@OP
No poll?

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,887

@889,862 (A)
ocd

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,918

@889,881 (K)
you need to read the rules again: http://minichan.org/rules

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #889,924

> Who's side to take?
> Who is side to take?

I'll let you explain what the fuck that's supposed to mean.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 1 week ago, 7 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,004

@previous (N)
Autocorrect mother fucker.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 14 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,006

@889,918 (B)

> you need to read the rules again: http://minichan.org/rules

@889,881 (K)

> http://minichan.org/rules

so the rules only apply to like me and syntax. but I can break them sometimes and it's ok
I'm ok with that

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 38 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #890,010

@previous (F)
Try reading them one more time: http://minichan.org/rules

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,082

@previous (B)
oh hey they got jokes now

Stealth replied with this 1 week ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,092

@previous (F)
You made me look and no c jokes

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 59 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,094

@889,788 (A)
no it's kinda the opposite
you have things on different axes
so gender on one axis
race on another
sexuality on a third
transphobia on a fourth
etc

and people's experiences exist on a différent position on these axes compared to one another
so like a straight black dude is gonna have a different experience compared to a trans white woman

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL double-posted this 1 week ago, 49 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,096

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
so it's just de conflating the various things that people experience privilege or oppression on

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,098

@890,094 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
> so like a straight black dude is gonna have a different experience compared to a trans white woman

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,107

@890,092 (Stealth)
well they replaced never with always

Stealth replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,108

@previous (F)
> Always do your very best to write "perfect" texts.

Good point because prior rules wood have me in deeeeeep trouble

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #890,113

@previous (Stealth)

> >Always do your very best to write "perfect" texts.
>
> Good point because prior rules wood have me in deeeeeep trouble

Methinks U need to work on Reading comprehension bcuz u R 1 dum as all fuck Tranny
:
[upload]

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting, also keep in mind you can minify URLs using MiniURL and generate image macros using MiniMacro.