Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Leo Vegas and Fats Ferguson: Where are they now?

brie !kGoudaMCFA started this discussion 1 week ago #62,360

Seriously. Where are they?

We need an updated version of "People who Died".

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #784,872

Leo Vegas is divorced after being caught out cheating on his wife with an underage girl and is a pariah in his community the last I heard

Anonymous B double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,873

Fats lives in Oregon and works in the cannabis industry. He is doing tremendously well for himself and is also very fit and strong. He has a new family also. Good for him!

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 13 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,876

@784,872 (B)
Not true but I appreciate the obsession

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 6 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,882

@previous (C)
you should probably just kys honestly

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,884

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Get fucked you boring cunt

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 4 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,885

@previous (C)
no, seriously
think hard about your life
when was the last time you contributed to the world, society, or even one other person's happiness?
you contribute nothing
you are a waste of resources
you should've gone through with it then. the good news is that you still have a chance! go for it, bud. drink that domestos.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 48 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,886

@784,882 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Who in the fuck is Anon C?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,887

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
isn't it obvious?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 9 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,888

@784,885 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Calm down you boring cunt

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,889

@784,887 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Not to me

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 42 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,890

I think Fats posted like a few months ago and I assume Vegas killed himself

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,891

@784,887 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Who do you think it is?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,892

@784,888 (C)
is it only teenage girls that you don't find boring?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,894

@784,888 (C)
Was she a cunt before you fucked her?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,896

@784,892 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Just you you boring cunt

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,897

@previous (C)
i hope your children realise what a disgusting person you are and disown you

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 41 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,898

@previous (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
And I hope you never have children you boring cunt

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,901

@previous (C)
me too, children sound like hell

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 21 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,902

@784,896 (C)
Why are you mad at her? You caused this muff up

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 4 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,903

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I'm not mad at her. I just think she's a boring cunt.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,904

@previous (C)
Using those words shows that you are mad. Maybe dont shit where you eat

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,905

Anon C is a troll.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #784,907

@784,904 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> Using those words shows that you are mad.

It doesn't. You're mistaking it with telling someone to kill themselves:

@784,882 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)

That indicates being mad.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,909

@previous (C)
Im not. Of course she is mad at you. You tricked an underage girl out of free vagina.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,912

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
That's all part of growing up

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,914

@784,909 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> Im not. Of course she is mad at you. You tricked an underage girl out of free vagina.

You seem to spend an awful lot of time obsessing over who is trying to trick little girls to give up their vaginas. Maybe you should get a life of your own?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,915

@784,912 (G)
Tricking kids into giving you sex?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,916

@784,914 (C)
Sorry that Im talking about a crime you committed. If only I could get a life like yours, and groom children over the internet.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,917

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> Sorry that Im talking about a crime you committed. If only I could get a life like yours, and groom children over the internet.

Try to find another hobby to replace obsessing over children on the internet.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 10 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,918

@784,914 (C)
Remember on Scatchan when I would defend triptych against constant sexual harrasment because she was underaged and you kept on telling me that she was grown up enough to handle it? I remember

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,919

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Nope.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 12 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,920

@784,917 (C)
Should I cross borders to meet them, as you did?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 double-posted this 1 week ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,921

@784,919 (C)
Lying pervert

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,922

@784,914 (C)
there is a reason that nobody stays around you
there's a reason that your best friend of years and years dropped you
(it's cause you're a dumpster fire)

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,923

@784,919 (C)
You were like trip really doesnt need you to defend her, she's very mature for her age.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 34 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,925

@784,920 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You can do anything you've a mind to.

Anonymous C double-posted this 1 week ago, 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,926

@784,923 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Was I now.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 0 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,927

@784,925 (C)
You would encourage child molestation

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,928

@784,922 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Calm down you boring cunt.

Anonymous C double-posted this 1 week ago, 17 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,929

@784,927 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Would I now.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,930

@784,926 (C)
Oh yes. Then I said that she can tell me so if she feels that way. But she never did.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,931

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Interesting. When did all this happen?

chili dog !!81dzJNNYL replied with this 1 week ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,932

@784,919 (C)
you're not even a good liar dude

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,934

@784,931 (C)
I used to defend you tg. Why?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,935

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
Why what?

Anonymous C double-posted this 1 week ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,936

@784,932 (chili dog !!81dzJNNYL)
Demonstrably untrue, ironically.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,937

@784,935 (C)
Why did I use to defend you when you do things like this?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 52 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,938

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
What's your theory?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,940

@previous (C)
On why you do these things? You're sick

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,941

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> On why you do these things?

No, on why you defended someone you believed to be a child molester.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,942

@784,938 (C)
My theory is that she saw you as a peer. A fellow weirdo.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,943

@previous (H)
You may be onto something. She certainly seems to invest an awful lot of time and energy into trying to bond with children, or else people she considers to be losers and pedophiles.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,944

@784,941 (C)
I never saw you as a child molester

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 5 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,945

@784,941 (C)
You draw shitty child porn for a hobby. Please just kill yourself.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,946

@784,942 (H)
I did seem him as a harmless fellow weirdo

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,947

@784,944 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I'll re-phrase, using your own words. Why did you defend someone who...

@784,927 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> would encourage child molestation

Anonymous C double-posted this 1 week ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,948

@784,946 (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> I did seem him as a harmless fellow weirdo

Encouraging people to molest children is "fairly harmless" to you?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,949

@784,947 (C)
Up until now I didnt see you defend child molestation

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #784,950

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
You're defensively back-tracking. You said tg "would encourage child molestation" and that you defended him.

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #784,951

@previous (C)
Because I thought that you were leo vegas until just now. I said that I had defended you after I realized that you were tg. And I never saw you (tg) as a child molester.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #784,952

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)
I see. So, to re-cap. You thought I was leo vegas. But then you 'realized I wasn't'. You then decided I was tg. So the question becomes: what are the chances you're wrong again?

kook !!OPZbEQMT1 replied with this 1 week ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #784,953

@previous (C)
Im not wrong. You've made me so sad.

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #784,954

@previous (kook !!OPZbEQMT1)

> Im not wrong.

Fair enough. You keep on compiling your notes on who is who and what on internet boards then.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 9 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,069

@784,952 (C)
You are being a cunt to literally the only person on these forums that actually tolerates you

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,094

@previous (F)
Nice white-knightpost, sad cunt.

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,095

@previous (C)
Not really, I don't think she should tolerate you, I was just saying that she was the only one that did

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,100

@previous (F)

> Not really, I don't think she should tolerate you

Why not?

> I was just saying that she was the only one that did

Why do you think this?

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,101

@previous (C)
Because you are a pedophile and because you are a pedophile

Anonymous H replied with this 1 week ago, 8 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,103

GOTTA ASK YOURSELF THE QUESTION
WHERE ARE THEY NOW

THOSE TWO FLORIDIANS
THEY GOT A TRAILER BY THE SEA

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,105

@785,101 (F)
Why do you think this?

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,106

@previous (C)
Because of all the cp you draw

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 15 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,114

@previous (F)
Have you seen this "cp"?

Anonymous F replied with this 1 week ago, 18 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,115

@previous (C)
I have seen the censored versions that were posted on tc a few times

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1 week ago, 59 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,116

> We need an updated version of "People who Died".

Well... Brie that may be up to you now. You are musically inclined. I wouldn't trust Falco to do it.

The torch has been passed.

(Edited 8 minutes later.)

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #785,128

@785,115 (F)
If they were "censored" then how do you know they were "cp"?

Anonymous B replied with this 1 week ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,174

@previous (C)

What are you arguing?

Anonymous C replied with this 1 week ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,175

@previous (B)
Nothing. I'm asking him how he knows something he saw was "cp" if it was "censored". Read through threads before asking what is being discussed in them, you'll find yourself confused about things less often.

Anonymous B replied with this 6 days ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,215

@previous (C)

Seems to me like you were asking a loaded question.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,217

@previous (B)
And now that the irreducibly direct question has been expained to you for the 3rd time, do you get it now? Or are you still struggling to understand this?

Anonymous B replied with this 6 days ago, 56 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,218

@previous (C)

I understand that you're talking utter pap.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,227

@previous (B)
So you don't understand the question. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous B replied with this 6 days ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,228

@previous (C)

Pish posh

Anonymous G replied with this 6 days ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,230

Looks like cp2comix is trying to defend his drawings of child porn again, by demanding everyone views them so he can call others pedos for looking at his "artworks"

Tracing over photos of children being abused and then claiming it is "art" should be enough reason to kick him and all his sockpuppet uid's and proxy ip's out of here.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 6 days ago, 48 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,233

Why do people keep bothering to reply to TG? He makes an obvious troll post and people keep falling for the bait and keep replying to him. Just leave the thread and forget about the weirdo.

Anonymous J double-posted this 6 days ago, 47 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,234

@785,230 (G)
Agree, he should've been banned months ago.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,237

@785,233 (J)

> Just leave the thread and forget about the weirdo

and...

@previous (J)

> Agree, he should've been banned months ago.

I love how you encourage everyone to just leave the thread and ignore TG...while spazzing out over TG in multiple posts :)))))

Anonymous C double-posted this 6 days ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,238

@785,230 (G)

> Looks like cp2comix is trying to defend his drawings of child porn again, by demanding everyone views them so he can call others pedos for looking at his "artworks"

Nobody is "demanding everyone views them". The question is simply being asked of someone who claims to have seen "cp" how he came by it. Any prosecuting lawyer or judge will ask the same thing, so look upon it as preparing you for your inevitable court case.

Anonymous J replied with this 6 days ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,239

@785,237 (C)
:)

Anonymous F replied with this 6 days ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,340

@785,128 (C)
I mean it was pretty obvious

Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,345

@previous (F)
How so? What made you think it was "cp"?

Anonymous H replied with this 6 days ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,347

@previous (C)
Hmmm... I guess there could be a few different ways, man. He might have a general concept of what CP might look like, and parts of the image he could see that weren't censored may have matched that general concept.

Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,383

@previous (H)
Let him answer for himself please. We'll be calling character witnesses later, you'll get your chance. I'm not asking for your proposals of "a few different ways" he "might" have come across "cp". I'm asking him directly how he did it.

Anonymous H replied with this 6 days ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #785,435

@previous (C)
Okay, then... Let me know when it gets to that stage of proceedings.

Anonymous F replied with this 6 days ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,442

@785,383 (C)
It was drawn porn with a child in it

Anonymous B replied with this 6 days ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,443

@previous (F)

But was it based on a real child?

Anonymous F replied with this 6 days ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,444

@previous (B)
That I don't know

Anonymous C replied with this 6 days ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,448

@785,442 (F)

> It was drawn porn with a child in it

So it wasn't censored? You lied about that. And your new version of events is that you have looked at child pornography on the internet.

Dear oh dear Colin, what a nightmare this thread ended up being for you, LOL. Trapped into admitting you're a dirty fucking pedophile.

Anonymous F replied with this 5 days ago, 11 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,521

@previous (C)
Yes it was censored. Who is Colin and what did he do to you

Anonymous C replied with this 5 days ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,527

@previous (F)

> Yes it was censored.

What was censored? And, by contast, what were you able to see that leads you to label it "cp"?

Anonymous B replied with this 5 days ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #785,528

Get
:
[upload]

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting, also keep in mind you can minify URLs using MiniURL and generate image macros using MiniMacro.