Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: Edgy people: what's the longest you've spent disproving the existence of God on Youtube comments?

Anonymous A started this discussion 4 months ago #61,695

Vote please, I am conducting research into the limits of human edginess
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
- 0%
- 0%
- 0%
1 25%
3 75%

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #778,725

10 years.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 5 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,727

> disproving the existence of God

This is like disproving I flushed my toilet at 6AM one month ago.

I have more valuable things to do with my time than disproving some silly fairy tale.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 21 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,738

@previous (C)

> some silly fairy tale.

Confirmed for edginess

Sheila LaBoof joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 6 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,739

everytime I read some pig retarded comment from some shithead, I conclude that no loving god would have permitted it

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 4 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,740

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)

> permitted it

So God ought to be a fascist in your opinion then? Deciding what people can and can't say or write?

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 4 months ago, 3 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,741

@previous (A)
you wouldn't be so contrary if god was real

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 58 seconds later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,742

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Why?

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 4 months ago, 3 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,745

@previous (A)
oh I should clarify and repeat, a loving god

such awfulness in the world does not preclude an indifferent or dick god

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 1 minute later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #778,746

@previous (Sheila LaBoof)
Your clarification still doesn't answer the question

Sheila LaBoof replied with this 4 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,747

indeed

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,750

@778,740 (A)

Well philosophically speaking free will doesn't really exist

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,751

@previous (E)
Prove that

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,752

@778,750 (E)

> Well philosophically speaking free will doesn't really exist

I am totally free to buy a shit load of weapons and then go and kill every fucking Philosopher I can locate.

Anonymous E replied with this 4 months ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,754

@778,751 (A)

Philosophically speaking, don't be a retard.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,755

@previous (E)
So you can't prove it. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous E replied with this 4 months ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #778,757

@previous (A)

Can you define "proof" here and now?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 20 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,763

@previous (E)
How will that help you, I asked to "prove" it, not "proof" it, you spastic. Anyway we've already established you can't, so thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous E replied with this 4 months ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,765

@previous (A)

The act of proving a proposition depends on the existence of proof, a so-far undefined entity. Could you care to take that stick out of your ass and answer this basic question?

Sophie !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 37 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,766

Proof's negroidal, therefore, God's Aryan. That'll be all.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,768

I don't dislike believers, as I was once a believer. I just feel sorry for them living in a fantasy world and hope they get on my level on understandment that there is no god. Thanks.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 11 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,769

@778,765 (E)
If you know the definition of 'prove' well enough to be using it, why are you struggling so much with its noun form? LOL you fucking spastic I've made such a mess of you here :) That'll be all.

Anonymous E replied with this 4 months ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,772

@previous (A)

Why can't you answer a straightforward question? What did you mean when you use the word "prove"?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 months ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,776

@previous (E)

> Why can't you answer a straightforward question? What did you mean when you use the word "prove"?

What "did" I mean when I "use"...dear lord, past tense, present tense, no idea what nouns or verbs are! You really are a hilarious spastic, aren't you? LOL thanks, that'll be all :))

FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,784

> youtube

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,789

@778,776 (A)

> > Why can't you answer a straightforward question? What did you mean when you use the word "prove"?
>
> What "did" I mean when I "use"...dear lord, past tense, present tense, no idea what nouns or verbs are! You really are a hilarious spastic, aren't you? LOL thanks, that'll be all :))

It looks like the atheists win again!

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 38 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,802

Write in: I don't watch YouTube.

Meta joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,827

Anonymous E replied with this 4 months ago, 12 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,936

@778,776 (A)

Yes I'm afraid I have to make a diagnosis of autism on this one

If only he wasn't so low functioning he could see what a fool he is :(

きゃさりん👘 !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 4 months ago, 13 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #778,937

Just tell everyone to take their Domestos instead.
:
[upload]

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting, also keep in mind you can minify URLs using MiniURL and generate image macros using MiniMacro.