Topic: You fucking aspie assholes.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 started this discussion 1.3 year ago #1,500

Tonight was my first shift at HArdee's. My fucking manager JUST called me. He said that he got a phone call from someone, saying that I am a scat freak and child molester. I know you fuckers did it! FUCK YOU!

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #28,615

This makes me sad.

You're one of the few people here who have ever been nice to me.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 24 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,616

I swear to God, if these aspie teenagers make me lose my job at Hardee's, I will fucking get revenge. I fucking mean it.

jump !VIfloDyEYo joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 31 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,617

@previous
Will it involve a drive go their home?

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 1.3 year ago, 43 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,618

@28,616

If you tell me the names and pen names of your published novels, I will buy some and get my friends to buy them then you will make some money in royalties.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,619

@28,615
Thank you, friend. They are trying to ruin my life. But this time, I swear, if they fuck me over at this job, I will fucking get my revenge.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,622

@28,617
It will involve a hell of alot more than that, I assure you.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,625

@OP

I thought you said you were going to drop the shtick. :-/

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 45 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,627

did you like it? =)

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 30 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,629

@previous
You think it is funny to ruin people's real lives and jobs? I swear to God, if you call Hardee's again, I will fucking make sure that you pay.

Anonymous F replied with this 1.3 year ago, 43 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,630

@previous
i'll be sure to call them again tomorrow. =)

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 35 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,631

@previous
If you do, I will call a Vendetta against you, and you will be very sorry. Leave HArdee's alone, asshole.

Anonymous F replied with this 1.3 year ago, 24 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,632

@previous
nope, i've got some funny stuff planned. =)

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 39 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,633

@previous
Then prepare for my revenge, asshole. you are a teenage asshole who has never had a job..you have no idea what the fuck you are doing.

Anonymous F replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,636

@previous
i can't wait for your revenge.

and i currently have a job at target. general manager. =)

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 28 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,637

@previous
And how wold you feel if someone called them with chan bullshit, and got you fired?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 49 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,638

How did they know that's where you worked?

Harleen Quinzel !!Sx3+/eCTM joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,639

@28,632
How in the world did you find his job

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 38 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,640

@28,631
lol, we all know you would never work at hardee's

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 21 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,641

@28,638
@28,639
Depressionman can't help but tell everyone how great he is doing, and exactly where he is working.

Harleen Quinzel !!Sx3+/eCTM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,642

@previous
But the exact one?

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 15 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,643

@OP
> mfw you never learn from your mistakes.

Hint: Don't post every detail of your life (i.e. your workplace) on a forum where there are people who hate you.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 12 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,644

Nope, not buying that one.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 44 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,645

@28,643
lol, internets.

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 1.3 year ago, 36 seconds later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,647

@28,644
Maybe you're correct Nega, maybe...

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 26 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,648

So everyone thinks it is just fine to ruin someone's life, and get him fired? You REALLY think that is ok??

Harleen Quinzel !!Sx3+/eCTM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,649

@previous
No.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,650

@28,648
Dude. We all know that you don't work at Hardee's. You don't need to make up some story about working at a shitty fast food place and being stalked just to get sympathy.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 41 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,651

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
In space, making sure gravity works the way its supposed to.
@28,647
Willing suspension of disbelief only goes that far I'm afraid.

Anonymous F replied with this 1.3 year ago, 22 seconds later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,653

@28,637
that wouldn't happen to me because i'm not stupid enough to post my full name and address on the internet.

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 1.3 year ago, 4 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,656

@28,651
:-)
@28,650
So, basically, either OP is lying about working at a fast food joint and being "stalked", or, OP's manager has actually received concerning phone calls in regards to his strong interest in children and scat porn. (All for some sympathy and attention, might I add.) Both of these options are equally amusing.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,658

@previous
Oh, they did call Hardee's, I assure you.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 56 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,660

@28,656
Let me put it to you this way: why would a manager at Hardee's care if somebody randomly called him and made random accusations about a new employee?

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 33 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,662

@previous
Because he is a manager, and runs a business.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,663

@previous
Right, and managers who run businesses believe everything that every telephone caller tells them.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 36 seconds later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,664

didn't happen, but if you ever did get your fat fucking ass out of the house and into a job, I would support people calling and telling your manager that you're a scat freak and a pedophile.

Jack !gOStA1p7Pc joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 36 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,665

@28,616
can i get in on that revenge?

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 25 seconds later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,667

@previous
How would you like to get in on it?

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 17 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,668

@28,664
I am a pedophile now?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 28 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,669

@28,662
How did they find out this information?

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 37 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,670

@previous
Who knows? Some people here are fucking aspie, and literally devote their entire lives to stalking people.

Jack !gOStA1p7Pc replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,675

@28,667

Anonymous F replied with this 1.3 year ago, 6 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,676

@28,670
oh yes, making one prank phone call suddenly makes me a stalker.

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,682

@28,660
Great point. I honestly doubt that they would take such wild accusations at face value. After a little bit of thought, I'm going to have to agree and side with everything you've said in this thread insofar.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,685

@previous
Yeah. I made a sarcastic quip earlier today claiming that I saw OP cooking the fries at a Hardee's, and he decided to add being on fry duty to his shtick.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 14 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,687

@28,660
If it happened multiple times, they would care.

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,689

@28,669
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/1444#reply_28102

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 33 seconds later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,692

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lvJ6eFcCJE&NR=1 [play]
> the stalker's faces when OP gets them.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 47 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,694

@28,687
What if it happened multiple times in OP's imagination?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 5 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,703

@previous
Then everything is fine. Well, fine for everyone who is not Matt.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,705

@previous
He doesn't believe it either. He's crazy, but not that crazy.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,707

@28,703
My friend, I am not joking about this stuff. There are a couple of angry teenagers here who are determined to enter my RL.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,709

@28,703

> Then everything is fine. Well, fine for everyone who is not Matt.

/thread
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo3Tpw-zLkM [play]

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,711

@28,707
Give it up. No one believes this shit. And another poster mentioned hardees as a joke, before you even mentioned hardees by name. You just went with it
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/1444#reply_28098

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 59 seconds later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,713

@previous
Whatever. Wait until they target you, and then we will see who is laughing.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,715

@previous
And you said it was an upscale place
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/1444#reply_28092

Try harder next time.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 47 seconds later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #28,716

@previous
Hardee's IS upscale compared to Taco Bell, which rejected me.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 25 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,717

@28,713
Veiled threats aren't a toy, bud.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 46 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,718

@28,716
Still doesn't explain that someone else mentioned it as a joke and you just went with it after you saw the thread on TC.

And I actually DID call Hardees (both locations in Lafayette) and they've never heard of you.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,720

@previous
I started tonight, so they may not have known my name. What is more disturbing, though, is that you actually took the time, and paid the money, to call two Lafayette Hardees's. You do realize how pitiful that makes you, yes?

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,721

@previous
The only thing more pitiful than pretending to call a Hardee's is pretending to work at a Hardee's.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,723

@28,720
You fucking imbecile. Stop making assumptions as to why I called. I was calling to tell them to expect calls of malicious nature. I talked to the staff manager at each restaurant so they would know you by name. They even said that they hadn't hired or needed new chefs in several months. And it didn't cost me a dime.

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,724

@28,721
Nah. Calling two Hardees's is pretty pitiful.

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 5 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,725

This thread again... they're likely doing this for a reaction from you, and you're giving them exactly what they want. You're only spurring them further, DM.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,726

@28,721
lol this.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,727

@28,713

> Whatever. Wait until they target you, and then we will see who is laughing.

Same old, same old.
Yu did this already, and the community's care levels are getting lower and lower.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,728

@previous
They reached negative levels long before the creation of ghoul.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,730

@28,725
And people will continue to do so since he provides such emotional responses.

As for the job at Hardee's? It's made up. I know because I'm the one who made it up.

Jack !gOStA1p7Pc replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,733

@28,723

> You fucking imbecile. Stop making assumptions as to why I called. I was calling to tell them to expect calls of malicious nature. I talked to the staff manager at each restaurant so they would know you by name. They even said that they hadn't hired or needed new chefs in several months. And it didn't cost me a dime.

It costs you your time, which you could have spent worrying about something other than random internet wannabe frenchmen

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,734

@previous
So did your reply.

Triptych !!DP4/G/5A6 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,736

Ouch.

Jack !gOStA1p7Pc replied with this 1.3 year ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,737

@28,734
do you want to end up like me?

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,738

@previous
What makes you think I'm not?

Jack !gOStA1p7Pc replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,739

@previous
Perhaps you are, but there is still hope for you

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,745

@previous
And you.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,748

@28,709
Is that cartoon actually about a child molester?

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,761

@previous

> Is that cartoon actually about a child molester?

No, that's just one side character.
The guy is the shows resident pervert, but AFAIK (only read about it) he never actually molests any of the girls.

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,764

@previous
I love that pervy men are considered a joke in Japan.

Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,771

There's only one way to settle this.

Anonymous F:

1) Did you, in fact, call Hardee's and claim that one of their empoyees - Matt Miller - was a scat fetishist and a pedophile?

2) If yes, where did you obtain your information?

3) Can you provide any evidence that you called them in the first place?

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,776

@previous
I'll settle this. I called Hardys, both locations in Lafayette and talked to the store manager. Neither had hired any new chefs in several months and had never seen or heard of Matt.

I searched for "hardys near lafayette" (or however the fuck it's spelt) on google maps to find the locations and numbers. I'm actually the one who posted that information on TC, which gave Matt the idea to post this thread. Remember that he never even mentioned hardys until after another poster mentioned it before him.

Anonymous Q double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,778

@28,764
You might like the "Welcome to the NHK". It's not your typical anime, and will likely remind you of some of the posters here. It's pretty funny. (pedophiles, stalking, seclusion, depression and delusions; it's got it all but they somehow still make it funny)

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,780

@28,776
It's real easy to convince OP to add something to his shtick. I once made a comment about how he should run a background check on his (former) apartment managers to see if they were criminal stalkers. He took it literally and began telling people that he uncovered a girl who was spying on him.

He just does this to get attention online. IRL, nobody pays attention to him.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,784

@28,776
Nobody was talking to you. Anon F stated he made the original call to Hardee's. If he has any evidence to support his claims, I'd like to see it.

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,785

@28,780
lol.
> He took it literally and began telling people that he uncovered a girl who was spying on him.
Sounds like he also drew on some of the plot from "Welcome to the NHK" too (mentioned above).

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,786

@28,778

> You might like the "Welcome to the NHK". It's not your typical anime, and will likely remind you of some of the posters here. It's pretty funny. (pedophiles, stalking, seclusion, depression and delusions; it's got it all but they somehow still make it funny)

I love you.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,787

@28,784
Fuck you too. I'm the one who posted the store locations in the first place. I called hardys before I posted the information. And what evidence could be posted?

Anonymous Q double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,788

@28,786
<3

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 second later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,789

@28,785
International conspiracy of women?
Check.

Satō on occasion also believes that the N.H.K. takes a more active role via the use of agents, although of course these agents only appear in dream sequences or flashbacks. Three types of N.H.K. agents are seen: the first are classic Men in Black who appear to have the ability to disguise themselves as anyone else they wish. They occupy key roles in a target's life, ensuring that they fail to develop. The second are cute, or more precisely moé girls who directly break the hearts of targets or who, via celebrity status, induce targets to have impossible or unrealistic expectations of relationships, destroying their ability to develop them in the real world (Satō never considers how, or even if, the N.H.K. would target women).

Pastad from Wikipedia.
Emphasis added.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,793

@28,787
How do we know you're telling the truth?

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,797

@previous
Any idiot can go to Google Maps, type "Hardee's Lafayette LA", and get a list of addresses and phone numbers.

I didn't post a street name just so OP would have to do his own research in case somebody called him out on his "job".

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,800

@28,793
So you believe a pathological liar who runs an organization that has been shown to post fake investigations? Someone who never mentioned where he worked but automatically went with a random guess as others pursued it.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,801

@28,797
So, we're expected to automatically believe that DM is lying, but that you are telling the truth?

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 second later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,802

@28,778
I'll download it tomorrow.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,806

@previous
The first few episodes aren't that great, but it does get good.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,808

@28,797
@28,800

Funny how Anon F has suddenly gone so quiet.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,809

@28,801
The chances are far against him. What are the odds that the other poster would correctly guess hardys out of all the restaurants? Very slim and even slimmer considering who we're talkinga bout.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,810

@28,801
Believe what you want to believe. I made up a lie, OP began using it to garner up some sympathy and you're biting the bait.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 8 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,811

@28,806
What other things do you watch? Not just anime.

psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,813

@OP
Just tell them you recently broke up with your girlfriend/got caught cheating and she is pissed off.

(Edited 23 seconds later.)

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,814

@28,808
Yeah, the FBI must have struck quickly. It must have been the private investigators DM hired to post and monitor MC.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #28,815

@28,809
Makes no difference whatsoever. DM, Anon F, Anon E and you have all made separate claims, but have provided no proof whatsoever. For all we know, any one of you could be lying.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,817

@previous
Well, if you want proof, ask OP to post a picture of his Hardee's name tag. I guarantee he won't be able to produce one because the Hardee's job is made up.

If you believe otherwise, you're being trolled.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 13 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,818

@28,810
> I made up a lie
So, you admit you're a liar, but you still expect us to believe you?

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 43 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,820

@previous
I'm telling the truth about making up a lie.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,821

@28,811
Yeah, I don't watch much anime or really much of anything lately. I was into Breaking Bad for a while, but haven't watched it lately. I'd love to find some more documentaries, something like "Dope Sick love".

Anonymous Q double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,823

@28,817
This. Also, if Anon T has ever been to hardy's he'll know damn well that the chef's don't wear what DM was in the picture he posted in the other thread. It's not a fucking upscale restaurant. It's practically a burger joint.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,827

@28,818
Why is DM the only one required to provide evidence? You've made no attempt to prove your claim. Neither has Q or F. If he has to prove his story, then so do all of you.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,832

@previous
Let me break this down for you:

• If I am telling the truth, you are stubborn and ignorant. I win.
• If I am lying, you still believe my story, even if by proxy. I win.

I win.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 29 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,834

@28,821
What's it about?

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 second later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,835

@28,827
Given his track record of honesty, it's safe to say he starts out at a negative credibility, below that of a random person off the street or any anonymous poster.

Anonymous Q double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,840

@28,834
Heroin and crack addictions in NYC. It's really a great documentary because no commentary is provided. The crew never interacts with the addicts, but just follows them along during their daily life. A completely unbiased picture of their lifestyle, neither vilified or glorified. A true gem for that type of subject.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 1.3 year ago, 44 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,842

@previous
I'll check it out.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,845

@28,832
You're still refusing to provide evidence of your claims, while practically demanding that DM provide evidence of his. Odd that you haven't questioned any of Anon F's posts. Then of course, if he supplied proof that he'd called Hardee's and tried to get DM sacked, that would mean DM's telling the truth.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Anonymous T double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,850

@28,835
I have no reason to believe any of you, until someone substantiates their claim.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,854

@previous
Oh, okay. Not the best at evaluating contradicting evidence are you?

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,855

@28,845
Perhaps you forgot to read my last post?

> I win.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,856

@28,850
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_and_Knaves
It should be clear who the obvious knave is. The only question is what are the rest of us? Looking at the odds alone, my claims are more likely, from a purely logical perspective.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,859

@28,854
Haven't seen any evidence from any one, so far.

Anonymous T double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,860

@28,855
You can only win if you prove your claim.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,861

@28,859
You're looking for proof that I am telling the truth and that I am lying at the same time.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,880

@previous
No, I'm asking you prove 2 things:

1) That you posted a message about DM working at Hadlees, prior to him claiming the same thing.

2) That DM used your (alleged) post to generate controversy in this thread.

The first part shouldn't be too difficult, all you have to do is provide us with a link and ask Nega to confirm the IP address.

The second part won't be quite so easy, as we have no way to either validate or falsify DM's claims of working at Hadlees.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,886

@previous
See for your self (not a post by me):
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/1444#reply_28098

The post that caused this thread was a thread I made on TC with links to google maps.

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,891

@previous
Link to the TC post and confirmation of your IP address?

Anonymous T double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,893

@28,856
As I know absolutely nothing about either of you personally, I have no reason to believe one over the other.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,894

@28,891
TC's went down an hour or so ago, idiot. And you still wouldn't believe me, as if I'd post my IP anyways.

(Edited 31 seconds later.)

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 1.3 year ago, 20 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,895

@28,891
Link forgot to pay the bills again, so it's down.
It doesn't matter who posted it; the only "important" (hurr internet is srs business) thing is the chronology.

(Edited 12 seconds later.)

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 58 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,896

@previous
And the chrnology of another poster posting about hardys before DM has already been shown.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,902

@28,894
> TC's went down an hour or so ago.

So, at this time, there's no evidence of your claims. If this is the case, post the link when Tinychan comes back up.

> as if I'd post my IP anyways.
You don't need to post your IP address, you just need to ask the mods on each board to confirm.

> (Nega)the only "important" thing is the chronology.

Possibly, but even the chronology has yet to be proven.

Anonymous T double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 48 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,904

@28,896
Link, please.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,906

@previous
see:
@28,886
or do I need to post this three more times?

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,920

@previous
Proves nothing, unless you are Ph !5pM9NZR/l6.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,925

@previous
It proves the chronology. Which was the entire claim.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,933

@previous
No it doesn't. Anon E claimed that a message about Hadlees was posted on TC previously, but has provided no evidence to support this. Assuming the message was posted at TC, how do we know that E posted it? Could have been any one - including DM himself.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,939

@previous
It doesn't matter who posted it. The link I provided shows that DM is not the first to mention hardys...the entire point.

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ replied with this 1.3 year ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,947

Anonymous T: Expert detective.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,948

@previous
Official GHOUL™ Crew Member

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 13 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,949

@28,939
As I understand it, you're claiming that DM doesn't work at Hardee's. Even if the chronology were established beyond a doubt (it isn't at this point), we still have no way to determine whether Matt Miller is employed at Hardee's or not.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,951

@previous
Occams razor. The odds are against it.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 25 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,952

@28,948
Sorry, but I have no connection with DM or any one of you outside this board.

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Anonymous T double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,955

@28,951
Odds for or against don't prove facts one way or another.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,958

@previous
Science actually can't prove anything. It can only give likelihoods.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,964

@previous
This isn't science. It's just a case of "he says this" vs "he says that".

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #28,967

@previous
The proof of facts does rely on science, or at least logic which is applied mathematics which is a science.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 24 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,045

@previous
Meaning at this point there's no way to determine beyond doubt whether DM is working at Hardee's or not. Funny how people go batshit crazy when you question something they consider fundamentally correct - despite having no direct evidence to support their beliefs.

"There is no supreme being." (RAGE!!!)
"Natural Selection is an unproven theory." (RAGE!!!)
"Not all Furries are faggots." (RAGE!!!)
"DM is capable of getting a job." (RAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEE!!!!!!)

Frankly amazed that this thread has lasted so long.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,238

@previous
Did I mention that I won?

Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 20 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,253

Minichan: We Know Drama™

dreamworks joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,259

i agree with lawrence on this one

Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,262

Just tell your boss that they're all lies and that next time this happens he should write down the caller ID info so that you can sue whoever is doing to it for slander and harassment. If they block their caller ID info, then your boss shouldn't be picking up. End of story.

dreamworks replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,265

@previous
also this

Green !pFNWNYROxA joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 56 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,305

@28,616
Stop it. I'm pretty sure you're making it up.

!tyLmN8C16E joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 45 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,333

ITT: unlimited faggotry

Dachan-da replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,335

@previous
lol 9/10 bud

Dachan-da double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,340

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
dont throw this on me bud, iv had peeps watching you for a while

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,342

@previous
Memes not a toy, bud. Grow up and leave.

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,349

Dachan-da replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,351

@29,342
lol 0/10 bud
@previous
lol 10/10 bud

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,353

@29,045
There's no direct evidence to support your disbelief either.

Ph !5pM9NZR/l6 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 30 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,354

@29,351
Your peeps are pervs...

Ph !5pM9NZR/l6 double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,356

@previous
Forgot pic

Anonymous Z-5 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,357

@OP
I think you're making it up, and you don't work at Hardees; you just want someone to call them and embarrass themselves. Yes?

Anonymous V replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,358

@29,356
lol 10/10 bud

cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 20 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,373

requesting tl;dr for this topic please

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,376

@previous
> DM's faked working at Hardees.
> Drama.

Anonymous Z-7 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 36 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,421

@28,958
> Science
> Can't prove anything

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,424

@previous
If you think that's trolling then you don't know much about it.

Take a look at any journal paper. The null hypothesis is rejected when the p value is normally less than .05

In every case, there's still a likelihood that chance alone would generate the prposed result but the idea is that if the chance is small we can safely assume that the effect is real...but it still doesnt prove anything technically.

(Edited 45 seconds later.)

Anonymous Z-8 joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 20 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,456

@OP
> implying this really happened

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 45 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,521

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
The point still stands.

Anonymous Q double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,530

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
You still cannot prove the null hypothesis is incorrect. The margin of error still exists, however small.

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

Investigator Bernstein triple-posted this 1.3 year ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,541

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Yes, to prove the null hypothesis is incorrect, as I said.

The Truth !!vSp31CfSr joined in and replied with this 1.3 year ago, 7 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,948

@OP
> Tonight was my first shift at HArdee's. My fucking manager JUST called me. He said that he got a phone call from someone, saying that I am a scat freak and child molester. I know you fuckers did it! FUCK YOU!

I did it, I don't give a fuck.
And it was just out of fun.

IF I AM IONIZED OR BANNED ONE MORE FUCKING TIME I WILL DO ANYTHING IN MY POWER TO FUCK YOUR LIFE UP, YOU GOT ME BANNED; I'LL GET YOU BROKE.
/butthurt rage

Now, how is everybody tonight?

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,955

@previous
You do realize that you will go to jail, or juvie in your case, if you do this kind of stuff?

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 59 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,956

@previous
@29,948
> implying either of you will ever do anything

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,957

@previous
I am not threatening him. I am just letting him know that if he lives his life trying to destroy others through stalking and harassment, that he will eventually end up in jail.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 33 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,959

@previous
> still implying that you will ever do anything

Depressionman™ !!fNJHcIUn0 (OP) replied with this 1.3 year ago, 26 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,960

@previous
It does not matter what I do. Eventually he will get caught.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 34 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,961

@previous
> implying with a passion that you will ever do anything or have anything done

The Truth !!vSp31CfSr replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,962

@29,955
> juvie
Not that young.
> jail
Nah, I won't.
No judge is going to give a fuck about a 30 year old living at moms that lives 13 states from me.

The Truth !!vSp31CfSr double-posted this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #29,963

@29,957
This is the first time I've done shit like that, I gotta admit it was fun and it would be very satisfying to get you fired.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,293

@29,948

A question for Anonymous E and Anonymous Q: is Truth lying? If he isn't, then DM is working at Hardee's.

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,296

@previous
I've already explained what happened, as have many other people, and you still don't know?

You should seriously consider being evaluated to see if you are autistic.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,298

@previous
In your opinion, is Truth lying or not?

Anonymous E replied with this 1.3 year ago, 32 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,299

@previous
About the calls? He's just playing along like I did.

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,318

@previous
So Truth is lying.

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,350

@previous
Took you that long?

Anonymous T replied with this 1.3 year ago, 46 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,369

@previous
Why would Truth claim to have called DM's place of employment if he doesn't believe he's working there? What would be the point of boasting about it on this board? Do you believe it's totally impossible that Truth is, in fact, telling the truth?

Anonymous Q replied with this 1.3 year ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,381

@previous
Because it could be true, it must?

Anonymous K replied with this 1.3 year ago, 49 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #30,396

@29,960

> It does not matter what I do. Eventually he will get caught.

You have no idea about how the justice system works, hmm?